DORA · ICT third-party contract remediation

DORA ICT contract remediation, evidence-backed in 21 days.

We compare your ICT vendor contracts against your Article 30 / outsourcing checklist and return a cited gap register, evidence pack, remediation memo, and wording suggestions for your lawyers to validate — every finding tied to source language.

Your lawyers and compliance team validate. We do the evidence work.

SERVICE · NOT SOFTWAREFOUNDER-LED · EU DATA RESIDENCY
The boundary, up frontWe produce evidence-backed review artifacts for your legal / compliance team to validate. We do not provide legal advice or regulatory representation.
NDA / DPA available before any file transfer.
No model training on your documents.
EU-hosted processing available for your files.
Deletion period agreed in advance.
The current state

Your DORA register says which ICT suppliers matter. Your contracts still need clause-level evidence.

5–50
ICT supplier contracts
in a typical triage batch
Art. 28 + 30
Register tells you who.
Contracts must prove what.

DORA has applied since 17 January 2025. Most teams now have a register, supplier inventory, and policy requirements — but the contract evidence still lives across MSAs, DPAs, security annexes, support schedules, subcontractor lists, order forms, and side letters.

The hard part isn't reading one contract. It's proving, consistently, where every Article 30 control is present, partial, missing, or contradicted — and being able to show that work to Legal, Compliance, Procurement, Internal Audit, or the regulator.

OpsSolved converts that document mess into a reviewable remediation register, with every finding tied to source language.

Who this is for

A sharp fit, deliberately scoped.

Good fit

You have the rules and the register — you need contract evidence, fast.

  • Financial entities with 5–50 ICT supplier contracts to triage.
  • DORA consultants supporting contract remediation.
  • Legal / compliance teams with a clause checklist.
  • Procurement or third-party-risk teams preparing remediation actions.
Not a fit

If you need any of these, we'll say so on the call and point you elsewhere.

  • Legal advice or regulatory representation.
  • A full CLM system deployment.
  • One-off negotiation strategy.
  • Generic vendor-management tooling.
What we check

Every Article 30 contractual control, clause by clause.

01Service description & scope
02Service locations & data location
03Subcontracting of ICT services
04Incident notification
05Security measures
06Business continuity & contingency
07Audit, access & inspection rights
08Termination rights
09Exit strategy
10Data & confidentiality
11Cooperation obligations
12Critical / important function clauses

Article 30 distinguishes general contractual requirements from the additional obligations that apply where a service supports a critical or important function. We flag each control as present, partial, missing, or contradicted — and tie the call to the exact clause it came from.

What you receive

Six artifacts. Built to be shown to the people who decide.

01
Article 30 gap registerFINDINGS.xlsx
One row per issue — Article 30 control, source citation, severity, recommended action, owner.
02
Evidence packEVIDENCE.pdf
Clause text, page reference, and present / partial / missing status for every control checked.
03
Remediation memoMEMO.pdf
Executive summary for Legal, Compliance, and CFO — priorities, not a contract to re-read.
04
Wording suggestionsWORDING.docx
Remediation wording suggestions for your lawyers to accept, reject, or edit — never rewrite from scratch.
05
Review methodologyMETHOD.pdf
How findings were produced and checked, so the review is defensible to an auditor.
06
Readout call45 MIN · RECORDED
Founder-led walkthrough of findings and a prioritized remediation path.
How the engagement works

Fixed scope. Fixed fee. You validate.

01

Fit call (20 min)

You describe your contract set, your checklist, and your deadline pressure. We tell you whether a fixed-scope sprint is a fit — or whether it isn’t.

20 MIN
02

Remediation sprint

Your playbook configured into the review pipeline, run across your contracts. You get the Article 30 gap register, evidence pack, and remediation memo. Your compliance team validates.

21 DAYS
03

Readout + corrections

A founder-led readout of findings and priorities, then one factual-corrections round after delivery. Larger portfolios are scoped as additional sprints.

FOUNDER-LED
Two ways in

Start with five contracts. Scale when it earns it.

The first paid step

5-contract diagnostic. Send 5 ICT contracts and one review checklist. We return a cited Article 30 gap register, evidence pack, and readout. If the output is useful, the fee credits into the full sprint — so you can test the work before committing to €12–15K.

Entry · low-risk
€2.5–4K
5-contract diagnostic
  • 5 ICT contracts, one checklist
  • Cited Article 30 gap register
  • Readout call + remediation path

If it's useful, scale to the full sprint — the diagnostic fee credits in.

Book a 20-min fit call
Full engagement
€12–15K
Remediation sprint
  • 20–30 contracts, 21 days, fixed scope
  • Full six-artifact package
  • Founder-led readout + corrections round

Design-partner pricing from €8K for early clients who provide a reference or anonymized case study.

Get the redacted sample pack
Get the sample pack

See the sample pack before
you talk to anyone.

Most teams want proof before a call. Tell us where to send it — a real redacted Article 30 gap register, evidence pack, memo, and one-page methodology, plus the 5-contract diagnostic offer.

Prefer to talk first? Book a 20-min fit call →

OpsSolved does not provide DORA compliance certification, legal advice, or regulatory representation. We help your team apply its ICT vendor review checklist across contract sets and produce evidence-backed findings; your legal and compliance teams validate findings and make final decisions.